Hello All:
THIS POST IS ESPECIALLY FOR YOU, SANDWICH-GRABBING ATTORNEY, AND YOUR MONITORS!:
Not that it would surprise anyone that a lawyer would LIE, they have worked hard to earn that reputation. The sandwich-grabbing attorney stood in the Superior Court yesterday and lied right in the judge's face! Later, when she "slipped" and revealed her lie, the judge just let it pass. BUT, I have it all on tape.
Hopefully, the Appeals Court won't be so willing to let her lie.
The most despicable thing I witnessed was her six-year-old-like behavior (tattling) in finding just the right opportunity to inject into the proceedings, "She's filed another one in Federal Court, just so you know judge."
To substantiate the "connection" and agreement to corrupt the legal process; she didn't stand very much when she addressed the judge. Why? Because the relationship between judge and attorney didn't require her to show even the remotest respect.
They tried to pull a fast one, counting on my ignorance, which I admit to, regarding a Motion I filed to compel one of their "buddies" to produce evidence. "He's not a party to this action," was the excuse for not wanting to grant my motion to compel him to turn over the discovery information I subpoenaed; a subpoena this very court had issued. I reminded them that the subpoena I requested was specifically addressed to a "Non-party."
The best part: From all indications the judge fully intends to CENSOR me and what I write on this blog, so much for the Constitution. I don't think the Appeals Court will agree to an order of censorship: Watch this video and be reminded of what CENSORSHIP looks like:
If you don't like what someone says or writes, just burn it!!
Just for shits and giggles I did some math: 82% of my book is written about the Town of Springerville's corruption; a mere 18% is written about an "individual;" >80% of sandwich-grabbing attorney's "evidence" is pages copied right out of my book; <18% of her "evidence" is from this blog. Interesting results, right? But, "they" will prevail because there isn't a single thing in the legal system of Apache County that even comes close to legal, just, or right. But, I knew that going in. I was stupid for thinking the truth, and proof of it, would make any difference. Corruption is the order of the day!!
The sandwich-grabbing attorney wasn't required to "show" that any of my comments or statements were false. Which, under non-corrupt circumstances, is a requirement of a libel suit.
I have removed ALL comments posted about you-know-who, and, that's as close to any censorship as "they" are going to get.
The "Three Men Make a Tiger" metaphor is alive and well; as evidence by the portrayal of the "poor victim" that has been through so much, to the judge.
Oh, I almost forgot: the sandwich-grabbing attorney's rhetoric that I "had no business in the Court filing papers or anything else." I guess she doesn't know about the laws that give me just as much right to access to the courts as anyone else. But, of course, there's a lot of laws she chooses to ignore and abuse to her own purpose.
Regards,
Looking4trth
